We benchmarked Superglue against traditional API integration approaches across 50+ real-world scenarios. The results show 10x faster development with higher reliability.

Executive Summary

10x Faster

Development Speed Average: 15 minutes vs 2.5 hours
Complex integrations: 1 hour vs 2 days

95% Less Code

Lines of Code Superglue: Natural language description
Traditional: 200-500 lines of code

Zero Maintenance

Ongoing Maintenance Self-healing when APIs change
Traditional: Manual fixes required

The Complete Benchmark

πŸ“Š View Full Interactive Benchmark β†’

Methodology

We tested real integration scenarios across different complexity levels:
Examples: \
  • Fetch customer list from Stripe \
  • Get contact details from HubSpot \
  • Query user data from database
    Traditional approach: 30-60 minutes
    superglue approach: 2-5 minutes
    Speedup: 10-15x

Detailed Comparison: Stripe Customer Sync

Let’s break down a real example: syncing Stripe customers to a CRM system.

Traditional Approach: 2.5 Hours

1

Research & Setup (30 mins)

  • Read Stripe API documentation
  • Set up authentication and API clients
  • Understand pagination and rate limits
  • Set up development environment
const stripe = require('stripe')(process.env.STRIPE_SECRET_KEY);
const axios = require('axios');

// Set up rate limiting
const rateLimit = require('express-rate-limit');
2

Write Data Extraction (45 mins)

async function getStripeCustomers() {
  const customers = [];
  let hasMore = true;
  let startingAfter = null;
  
  while (hasMore) {
    try {
      const response = await stripe.customers.list({
        limit: 100,
        starting_after: startingAfter,
        created: { gt: getDateThirtyDaysAgo() }
      });
      
      customers.push(...response.data);
      hasMore = response.has_more;
      startingAfter = response.data[response.data.length - 1]?.id;
      
      // Respect rate limits
      await sleep(100);
    } catch (error) {
      if (error.code === 'rate_limit') {
        await sleep(5000);
        continue;
      }
      throw error;
    }
  }
  
  return customers;
}
3

Data Transformation (30 mins)

function transformCustomerData(stripeCustomers) {
  return stripeCustomers.map(customer => ({
    external_id: customer.id,
    email: customer.email,
    name: customer.name || customer.email?.split('@')[0],
    created_date: new Date(customer.created * 1000).toISOString(),
    subscription_status: getSubscriptionStatus(customer),
    lifetime_value: calculateLifetimeValue(customer),
    // ... more transformations
  }));
}

function getSubscriptionStatus(customer) {
  // Complex logic to determine subscription status
  if (customer.subscriptions?.data?.length > 0) {
    const activeSubscriptions = customer.subscriptions.data
      .filter(sub => sub.status === 'active');
    return activeSubscriptions.length > 0 ? 'active' : 'inactive';
  }
  return 'none';
}
4

CRM Integration (45 mins)

async function syncToCRM(customers) {
  const batchSize = 50;
  const batches = [];
  
  for (let i = 0; i < customers.length; i += batchSize) {
    batches.push(customers.slice(i, i + batchSize));
  }
  
  for (const batch of batches) {
    try {
      await axios.post(`${CRM_BASE_URL}/customers/batch`, {
        customers: batch
      }, {
        headers: {
          'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.CRM_API_KEY}`,
          'Content-Type': 'application/json'
        },
        timeout: 30000
      });
      
      console.log(`Synced ${batch.length} customers`);
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Batch sync failed:', error);
      // Individual retry logic...
      for (const customer of batch) {
        await retrySingleCustomer(customer);
      }
    }
  }
}
5

Error Handling & Testing (30 mins)

async function retrySingleCustomer(customer, retries = 3) {
  for (let i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
    try {
      await axios.post(`${CRM_BASE_URL}/customers`, customer, {
        headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.CRM_API_KEY}` }
      });
      return;
    } catch (error) {
      if (i === retries - 1) {
        console.error(`Failed to sync customer ${customer.email}:`, error);
      } else {
        await sleep(1000 * (i + 1));
      }
    }
  }
}

// Testing and debugging...
Total: 2.5 hours + ongoing maintenance

Superglue Approach: 15 Minutes

1

Connect Integrations (5 mins)

In the Superglue UI or via API:
  • Add Stripe integration with API key
  • Add CRM integration with credentials
  • Test connections automatically
2

Describe What You Want (2 mins)

// First build the workflow
const workflow = await superglue.buildWorkflow({
  instruction: `Get Stripe customers created in the last 30 days and sync them to our CRM. 
  Include email, name, subscription status, and calculate lifetime value from their payment history.`,
  integrationIds: ["stripe", "internal-crm"],
  responseSchema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      synced_customers: { type: "number" },
      success_rate: { type: "number" },
      errors: { 
        type: "array",
        items: { type: "string" }
      }
    }
  }
});

// Then execute it
const result = await superglue.executeWorkflow({ workflow });
3

Test & Refine (5 mins)

Review results, adjust if needed:
// If you need adjustments, build and execute a refined workflow:
const refinedWorkflow = await superglue.buildWorkflow({
  instruction: `Same as before, but also include the customer's latest invoice amount 
  and mark customers with failed payments as 'at_risk'`,
  integrationIds: ["stripe", "internal-crm"]
});

const refinedResult = await superglue.executeWorkflow({ workflow: refinedWorkflow });
4

Save for Production (3 mins)

await superglue.upsertWorkflow(result.workflow.id, result.workflow);
Total: 15 minutes + zero maintenance

What Makes Superglue 10x Faster?

Automatic API Understanding

Traditional: You read docs, understand endpoints, handle auth
superglue: AI reads docs automatically, figures out the right API calls

Built-in Best Practices

Traditional: You implement retries, rate limiting, error handling
superglue: All reliability features including rate limit handling and validation by default

Schema-Aware Transformations

Traditional: You write custom transformation code
superglue: AI understands source and target schemas, creates optimal transformations

Self-Healing Maintenance

Traditional: Breaks when APIs change, requires manual fixes
superglue: Detects changes, automatically adapts workflows

Real Customer Results

Challenge: Sync product data between Shopify, inventory system, and
marketing tools
Traditional estimate: 2 weeks of development
superglue actual: 3 hours
Results: \
  • 40x faster implementation \
  • Zero maintenance issues in 6 months \
  • Automatic adaptation to Shopify API changes

Technical Comparison

Lines of Code Comparison

Traditional (45 lines):
const axios = require('axios');

async function getStripeCustomers() {
  try {
    const response = await axios.get('https://api.stripe.com/v1/customers', {
      headers: {
        'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.STRIPE_SECRET_KEY}`
      },
      params: {
        limit: 100
      }
    });
    
    return response.data.data.map(customer => ({
      id: customer.id,
      email: customer.email,
      name: customer.name,
      created: new Date(customer.created * 1000)
    }));
  } catch (error) {
    if (error.response?.status === 429) {
      // Rate limit handling
      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 5000));
      return getStripeCustomers();
    }
    throw error;
  }
}
Superglue (1 line):
instruction: "Get Stripe customers with ID, email, name, and creation date"

When Traditional Coding Still Makes Sense

Superglue isn’t always the best choice. Here’s when you might still want traditional coding:
❌ Extreme performance requirements (<50ms latency)
❌ Custom protocol implementations (not REST/GraphQL/SQL/SOAP/CSV/SQL)
❌ Highly specialized data processing (complex algorithms)
❌ Fire and Forget integrations - implement once, never touch again

Try the Benchmark Yourself

1

Pick a Real Integration

Choose an actual integration project you’re working on or considering
2

Time the Traditional Approach

How long would it take to build with traditional coding? - API research and setup - Code development - Testing and debugging - Error handling - Documentation
3

Time the Superglue Approach

Start with Superglue and see how long the same integration takes
4

Compare Results

Most teams see 8-15x speedup on their first try

Next Steps